• Home
  • In a nutshell
  • Our Story in 24 minutes
  • Publications
  • What farmers said
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Search
Menu

The Cicerone Project

Northern Tablelands
Phone Number
compare-measure-learn-adopt

compare-measure-learn-adopt

The Cicerone Project

  • Home
  • In a nutshell
  • Our Story in 24 minutes
  • Publications
    • 1 - Beginnings of project
    • 2 - Survey of producers
    • 3 - Footrot trials
    • 4 - Farmlet planning
    • 5 - Experimental guidelines
    • 6 - Statistical approaches
    • 7 - Soil fertility
    • 8 - Climate experienced
    • 9 - Botanical composition
    • 10 - Herbage mass and pasture growth
    • 11 - Satellite imagery
    • 12 - Energy balance
    • 13 - Animal liveweights
    • 14 - Fat scores and reproduction
    • 15 - Wool production, quality and value
    • 16 - Worm egg counts
    • 17 - Profitability
    • 18 - Economic risk
    • 19 - Optimising management
    • 20 - Optimising fertiliser
    • 21 - Tree growth
    • 22 - Extension
    • 23 - Integrated analysis
    • 24 - Reflections
  • What farmers said
  • About
  • Contact
  • Blog
  • Search
footrot.jpg

3 - Footrot trials

Abstract

The Cicerone Project was formed in 1998 to address problems faced by wool producers. In the New England area, the issue of suspected false positive diagnoses of virulent footrot, which can be a significant cause of economic loss to individual producers, was investigated. In New South Wales, footrot diagnosis is primarily a field diagnosis supported by the gelatin gel laboratory test. The principal causative agent of footrot is Dichelobacter nodosus. If the gelatin gel test finds strains of D. nodosus to be thermostable (gel stable), a finding of virulent footrot is likely and quarantine of the affected property follows. However, livestock producers and inspectors reported that there were a considerable number of cases where laboratory tests found strains to be stable but these strains did not cause virulent footrot in the field. Preliminary results using DNA markers associated with virulent footrot showed that one of these markers, intA, was absent in gel stable, field benign strains but present in all strains tested which caused field virulent footrot. A trial conducted at Uralla, New South Wales, demonstrated conclusively that there were strains of D. nodosus which were stable in the gelatin gel test but did not cause virulent footrot in the field. All of these strains were negative in the intA DNA test. These results were confirmed in a second field trial at Molong, New South Wales. These trials were instrumental in establishing that the gelatin gel test at times gave results inconsistent with the clinical expression of footrot, potentially leading to a false positive diagnosis of virulent footrot. Subsequent research led to confirmation of the intA test, which is now available as an additional tool for footrot diagnosis.

Paper title:  

Producer-initiated field research leads to a new diagnostic test for footrot

Link to published Abstract and Full paper:  Click here ...

3 - Footrot trials

Abstract

The Cicerone Project was formed in 1998 to address problems faced by wool producers. In the New England area, the issue of suspected false positive diagnoses of virulent footrot, which can be a significant cause of economic loss to individual producers, was investigated. In New South Wales, footrot diagnosis is primarily a field diagnosis supported by the gelatin gel laboratory test. The principal causative agent of footrot is Dichelobacter nodosus. If the gelatin gel test finds strains of D. nodosus to be thermostable (gel stable), a finding of virulent footrot is likely and quarantine of the affected property follows. However, livestock producers and inspectors reported that there were a considerable number of cases where laboratory tests found strains to be stable but these strains did not cause virulent footrot in the field. Preliminary results using DNA markers associated with virulent footrot showed that one of these markers, intA, was absent in gel stable, field benign strains but present in all strains tested which caused field virulent footrot. A trial conducted at Uralla, New South Wales, demonstrated conclusively that there were strains of D. nodosus which were stable in the gelatin gel test but did not cause virulent footrot in the field. All of these strains were negative in the intA DNA test. These results were confirmed in a second field trial at Molong, New South Wales. These trials were instrumental in establishing that the gelatin gel test at times gave results inconsistent with the clinical expression of footrot, potentially leading to a false positive diagnosis of virulent footrot. Subsequent research led to confirmation of the intA test, which is now available as an additional tool for footrot diagnosis.

Paper title:  

Producer-initiated field research leads to a new diagnostic test for footrot

Link to published Abstract and Full paper:  Click here ...

footrot.jpg
03-footrot.jpg
You must select a collection to display.

Supporters

AWI
University of New England
NSW DPI
Sheep CRC
CSIRO